The Impact of Mediation in Business Decisions Research Proposal

The Impact of Mediation in Business conclusivenesss - Research Proposal ExampleDisputes may arise among employees, or labor union disputes against the company out-of-pocket to issues such as retrenchment, promotions, rewards, pay rise among a host of other problems. In these events, conflict resolution is sought to settle the problems. There are several(prenominal) channels followed by different companies in making compromises in decision making including judicial proceeding, negotiation, mediation and arbitration. It is clear that more and more military controles are finding litigation a less popular option, and are seeking to adopt other channels. While mediation is quite efficient in making sound business decisions, few businesses fall upon the decision to take it. It is thus imperative that considerable wealth of information needs to be generated on mediation, based on case studies. This forget involve studying the mediation decision in terms of evidential reasoning, risk analysis, knowledge of what the decision entails and finally the impact of the decision on the business. Did mediation solve the problem or deadlock in decision making to the companys satisfaction? This research will analyze mediation in all these areas with a bid to conclude on whether the decision to undertake it is satisfying in comparison to other methods. Thus, this research is particularly synchronised with Manchester Business Schools focus on addressing the issues affecting business leaders across the world. Under MBS, this research falls in the division for Decision analysis, support and risk management. Specifically, it will harmoniously integrate within the Decision and Cognitive Sciences Research Centre (DCS), where the decision to undertake mediation by businesses will be studied in terms of evidential reasoning, risk analysis, and impacts. LITERATURE REVIEW Business disputes are usually settled through several ship canal which can be broadly categorized into two litiga tion and alternative dispute resolution. Litigation involves visiting law courts to have the dispute settled by a judge while alternative methods imply negotiation, arbitration, mediation and arbitration. There is compelling evidence that the decision to take alternative dispute resolution methods everywhere litigation is a wise one especially in terms of two very important things time and cost savings (Paul 1). Other benefits include the fact that both parties conscript the services of neutral expertise (National Arbitration Forum 4). Alternative dispute resolutions also bring about flexibility which is indifferent in litigation. This is through innovation and ingenuity in the processes involved in a fashion that a court may not undertake (5). Amicability, confidentiality and caller representation are also other benefits over litigation (6). One of the main setbacks to these methods of resolution is the compromise involved, which may be counteractive. The other disadvantage is that the pretermit of public scrutiny (Spangler, 2003). To disambiguate among the various strategies used in alternative dispute resolution is important since several business leaders are more often than not ignorant on the different concepts. First, mediation differs from arbitration in terms of the fact that arbitration is an adjudicative process that involves hiring an adjudicator to hear out the dispute and make a decision that is usually enforceable in court. In mediation however, the mediator does not make a decision for the parties, while another diversity is that mediation is a voluntary process with nonbinding agreements (Shakman et al, 2001). Among the methods involved in alternative dispute resolution, it has been found that most businesses decide to use arbitration and negotiation over mediation, despite of much